Check what the whole image block implies
Read the image together with its nearby heading and caption. A licensed stock worker beneath 'Our technicians' can imply a real employee even without a name. A generic renovated room beneath 'Recent projects' can imply work the business completed. List these cases before choosing replacements. Licensing permission and accurate representation are different questions.
Separate decoration from project evidence
W3C image guidance distinguishes an image's purpose and context. Google also emphasizes trustworthy content. Use those principles to make your own photo categories explicit: genuine team image, genuine project evidence, generic illustration or purely decorative visual. The business should verify permissions and any claimed connection before publishing the image as proof.
Source checks: W3C WAI: Informative Images · Google Search Central: Creating Helpful, Reliable, People-First Content
Review captions and surrounding headings
Create a small image inventory focused on customer-decision pages. For each image, record its source, intended role, visible claim and proposed action. Do not assume that adding tiny 'illustration' text resolves a strongly misleading heading. If the photo's role conflicts with the page, replace the block or revise the surrounding description.
- Inspect images on About, service and portfolio pages alongside their headings.
- Identify which photos are genuine staff or work and which are licensed illustrations.
- Verify rights and facts with the owner; remove unverified project or team claims.
- Use neutral illustration context or replace the image with genuine, approved evidence.
- Check captions, text alternatives and mobile layout for the same intended meaning.
Avoid labels that invent a team or outcome
Do not invent employee names for stock faces or describe an illustration as a job completed locally. An image can be correctly licensed but still placed in a misleading context. Avoid hiding the distinction in a footer while the main page presents a portfolio. Do not promise that replacing stock imagery will produce a particular ranking or conversion result.
Test interpretation rather than attractiveness alone
Ask a test reader what they think each sensitive image represents. If they assume it is your team or project when it is not, revise the context. Keep a count of corrected image blocks and unresolved permissions. These checks establish clarity and provenance; they are not a statistical measurement of customer trust.
Retain image provenance
Store the image source, licensing record and approved role with the content inventory. Keep genuine portfolio images separate from decorative assets so future page edits do not mix them. When staff or services change, review factual captions. Public project images should retain their appropriate approvals and avoid exposing unnecessary customer information.
Worked example: an illustrative customer journey
For example, a handyman website places a licensed stock tradesperson beneath 'Meet our local team'. The business is a sole operator, and the person pictured is not connected to it. The owner replaces that block with a genuine approved owner photo and a factual introduction.
Elsewhere, a stock illustration remains beside a general process explanation without pretending to document a job. The change corrects what the images imply. It does not demonstrate a measured improvement in trust, enquiries or search position.
Illustration versus evidence
Stock decoration
Generic illustration with honest context
Genuine team photo
Verified people and approved use
Project portfolio
Work the business actually completed
Unverified claim
Replace image or revise the block
Your practical checklist
- Read each image with its surrounding heading and caption.
- Verify which people and jobs are genuinely connected.
- Keep licensing permission separate from factual representation.
- Remove unverified portfolio and team implications.
- Use context-appropriate text alternatives and captions.
- Retain provenance for images used in decision pages.
Your next action
Review the images under your team and project headings and correct one unverified implication.
Questions about this task
Can I use stock photography at all?
Yes, with appropriate rights and honest context. It should not masquerade as your staff or completed work.
Does a small disclaimer fix every case?
Not necessarily. The main heading and placement can still create the wrong impression.
Can an illustration explain a service process?
Yes, when its role is clear and its details are accurate. Keep it separate from genuine portfolio evidence, and do not attach invented staff identities or customer results to an illustrative scene.
Sources and editorial notes
Prepared with AI-assisted research. Official sources are linked below; worked examples and checklists are Getting Found Local recommendations, not measured client outcomes.
Sources checked October 13, 2026. Platform interfaces and local resources may change; follow the current instructions on the linked official page.
- W3C WAI: Informative Images ↗
- Google Search Central: Creating Helpful, Reliable, People-First Content ↗
How we research, illustrate, and update these guides · Suggest a correction