Choose one uncertainty worth investigating
Start with a decision, such as whether customers understand your proposed service, what information they need before contacting someone, or why a previous search was difficult. Keep the first round narrow enough to influence a real launch choice. You are gathering evidence about a buying situation, not asking people to approve your business idea.
Our fictional example is a mobile bicycle mechanic deciding how to describe a commuter tune-up. The owner assumes convenience is the main concern, but wants to learn what riders actually check before booking. The interview objective becomes: Understand how commuters recently chose bicycle repairs and what made contacting a provider easy or difficult.
Find likely customers beyond your closest supporters
GOV.UK's research guidance recommends recruiting actual or likely users and defining participant criteria. For this exercise, write a short screen: has faced the relevant problem recently, falls within your proposed coverage, and could realistically use the service.
The mechanic might invite a small mix of local commuters who recently arranged repairs, including someone who postponed the work. Our recommendation is to start with four short conversations as an exploratory exercise, then seek additional perspectives where the findings conflict. This is not a representative survey or a way to estimate market size. Explain the purpose, avoid turning the conversation into a sales pitch, and collect only the notes you need.
Ask about the last real decision
Home Office interview guidance warns against leading questions and explains when open questions are useful. Prepare neutral prompts and leave room for unexpected answers. Ask permission before recording; written notes are enough for a small planning exercise.
Use this interview card: What happened the last time you needed this service? Where did you look first? What information did you check? What nearly stopped you from contacting someone? What happened after you made contact? If they have not faced the situation, note that rather than encouraging an invented story.
For the mechanic, Did you choose the most convenient service? suggests the desired answer. What mattered when you chose a repair option? leaves the participant free to discuss trust, timing, suitability, or another concern. Ask a follow-up when an answer is vague, and keep your own explanation of the proposed business until the end.
Separate observations from your launch assumptions
Use four columns: participant code, observed experience, your interpretation, and decision to check. Avoid storing names in the working summary. Record disagreement rather than combining different experiences into a supposed average customer.
Suppose two riders wanted to know whether repairs could happen at their workplace, while another first checked which bicycle types were supported. The mechanic could clarify appointment locations and service suitability in the offer, then ask another rider to explain that offer back. Those are testable launch improvements; three comments do not prove which message will generate the most business.
Finish with one revised service statement and one unresolved question for the next conversation. The useful output is a clearer understanding of whom you can help and what they need to decide, before you invest in a finished website.
Your practical checklist
- Name one launch decision the interviews should inform.
- Define who recently experienced the relevant problem.
- Recruit beyond people likely to agree with you automatically.
- Ask neutral questions about real past decisions.
- Keep observations separate from your interpretations.
- Revise one service assumption and record what remains uncertain.
Written with AI-assisted research and drafting, with source checks and editorial review for this guidebook. Platform facts link to official documentation. Examples and recommendations are our own; no client results are implied. Sources reviewed October 8, 2026. About Getting Found Local